Clinical StudiesCase StudiesCase Study Pictures
Frequently Asked QuestionsAbout LymphedemaAbout Venous DiseasePrinciples of BandagingLinks
Current IssuePast Issues
Order FormSizing ChartsInsuranceDealers
Juxta-FitReady-Fit Classic-FlexGraduate Whole Leg EZMeasure-Up Arm-SleeveSilhouette
LymphedemaVenous DiseaseAccessoriesAll Products
Juxta-LiteT-3 EZ Boot & C-3 EZ WrapT-3 Boot & C-3 Wrap
Products
Ordering
Certification
Studies
Newsletter
Learn
About Us
HistoryTestimonials
Contact
New CircAid Medical Blog

CIRCAID LEGGING VS. UNNA BOOT

 

RG DePalma, M.D., RK Spence, M.D., JA Caprini, M.D., MR Nehler, M.D., J. Jenson, D.P.M., MP Goldman, M.D.,

WP Bundens, M.D.  In a multi-center prospective, randomized study, the cost and healing rates for treatment of venous ulcers was compared between the CircAid T-3 Boot and Unna boot.  Cost of treatment was significantly less.  The total cost of treatment was 38% less with the T-3 Boot and this difference was statistically significant.  Healing rates were 45% faster with T-3 Boots, though this value did not reach statistical significance because of large standard deviations. Presented at the eleventh annual meeting of the American Venous Forum, February 18-21, 1999 Dana Point, CA. Published November / December 1999 in Vascular Surgery.

Request Full Article

Back