Clinical StudiesCase StudiesCase Study Pictures
Frequently Asked QuestionsAbout LymphedemaAbout Venous DiseasePrinciples of BandagingLinks
Current IssuePast Issues
Order FormSizing ChartsInsuranceDealers
Juxta-FitReady-Fit Classic-FlexGraduate Whole Leg EZMeasure-Up Arm-SleeveSilhouette
LymphedemaVenous DiseaseAccessoriesAll Products
Juxta-LiteT-3 EZ Boot & C-3 EZ WrapT-3 Boot & C-3 Wrap
Products
Ordering
Certification
Studies
Newsletter
Learn
About Us
HistoryTestimonials
Contact
New CircAid Medical Blog

CIRCAID LEGGING  VS. COMPRESSION STOCKINGS PRESSURE COMPARISON

 

Directed by Alan R. Hargens, Ph.D., at UCSD Medical Center, this study compared skin surface pressures underneath the inelastic CircAid T-3 M garment with Built-In Pressure System set to 40mmHg vs. an elastic 30-40mmHg below-knee compression stocking.  The CircAid T-3 M leggings produced significantly higher skin pressures than elastic leggings at both leg regions (p<.001).  Mean pressures over all trials using the CircAid T-3 M leggings were 47±3 and 35±2 mmHg for ankle and below-knee regions, respectively.  Mean pressures using the elastic leggings over all trials were 26±2 and 23±1mmHg for ankle and below-knee regions, respectively.  Only the CircAid T-3 M leggings produced a significant reverse-pressure gradient between the knee and the ankle (p<.05), whereas the elastic leggings did not.  Published in Vascular, Volume 16, No. 1, 2008.

Request Full Article

Back